 | | Re: Nugator.com - New Lego Retail Super Site
|
|
(...) Yeah, smacks of the rip-off EB discount card to me. If all I were to get is a 5% discount I'd have to spend $1200 to "break even" on my $60. Who knows, though, maybe they're talking 10% or more. Or maybe the other things will really be worth (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Playing with it in photoshop should actually work pretty well. Just shift the hue to get blue, you won't even have to play with saturation. --Bram (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | First Meeting of NOVALTC!
|
|
Sorry- I meant to send an update. We had our meeting as planned at the historic Union Station in Washington, DC last Sunday. Jeff Stembel brought along his steam engine. Nice Work! Being our first meeting, most of out time was spent discussing Lego (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S. Lego (Was Re: What is Samsonite Lego?)
|
|
I was always under the impression that a lot of European and other parts of the world countries had very high tariffs as well. We have NAFTA (North American Free trade Agreement) here that reduced a lot of the taxes, etc. between the US, Mexico, and (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: no new SW LEGO this year
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:51:12 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) British poster. Extremely rare to get new sets before just after new year in the UK. (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Loose or Clumps?
|
|
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999 17:01:00 GMT, Chris Phillips uttered the following profundities... (...) I have a box into which fits perfectly columns of 2x4's, 25 bricks high, two to a level. Also, 1x4's, same height. (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep
|
|
(...) Why? 50% off isn't THAT great a deal. Now 75% off, maybe. (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Like, right underneath the logo-bar. How about: "This site is better than official! It's [fan created], and The LEGO Group has nothing to do with!" Steve (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) I never said it was your intention to deceive. I just think the implied attitude behind "anyone with a clear understanding of English" is a little misplaced, given the fact that your eBay description is NOT crystal clear. If it were, you (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) GNU free, or just no-price? It could have been worse--it could have only run on a BeBox. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Nugator.com - New Lego Retail Super Site
|
|
(...) I think the idea is that it is a monthly fee, not yearly; hence, if you wished to get a discount on something, or just wanted to be part of a contest than ran for a month or two, you'd have to pay the $5.00 fee for that month. Also, if it is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Last week I had a bidder with a rating of -1. That did worry me, I must admit. Then after a day or so he got some feed back, so his rating was boosted to zero. He was outbid in the end. -- Scott A Edinburgh, Scotland. (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | 3011 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 [DAT]
|
|
0 Duplo Brick 2 x 4 0 Name 3011.dat 0 Author: Steve Bliss 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Part 1 16 40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 -40 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 76 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 3437 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 [DAT]
|
|
The Duplo Terror has begun! <gg> 0 Duplo Brick 2 x 2 0 Name 3437.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official Element 1 16 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 -9.5 0 0 0 2 stud4.dat 1 16 0 48 0 36 0 0 0 -44 0 0 0 36 box5.dat 4 16 40 48 40 36 48 36 -36 48 36 -40 48 40 4 16 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) The more I think about it, I think a simple letter would do. But first I think we should experiment a bit with different logos and present them printed on the letter so they can review them right there and state their preference. Once I get (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
(...) So am I...to a point...$40 for empty boxes...I'd start having my doubts. Unfortunately, I've been left hanging more than a few times by those with no feedback. Good luck to you. Julie He/she is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Well, if we were to contact TLG, what would be the best approach to it, to get on their good side? I'm not totally objected to contacting them, I just would like to make sure we've done everything we can to have them not jump on us beforehand. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Box Progress
|
|
(...) The only reason I thought each box should have a received/log/mailed thread of its own was to help Tamy. I know she's back at school and I thought it would be less time consuming for her to check to see who wants to be added if we keep the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: FA : SOCCER SETS AND SUB-SETS (all new misp/misb)
|
|
Also for the record, Scott had appended his eBay posting to explicitly state the boxes are empty *before* anyone here pointed out the possibly misleading description. And Scott, sorry if my first contribution to this thread sounded accusatory - I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
