 | | Re: source for 1 x 12 technic beams in red?
|
|
(...) I got a bunch of 1x12 red technic bricks at pick a brick at Legoland and imagination center in CA. If you don't have access to a pick a brick that has any, I would say bricklink. I've always had good success buying on bricklink. Mark (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
 | | Re: Coming to Kalamazoo
|
|
(...) Makes sense, shouldn't be a big deal to meet in Kalamazoo. (...) Fanfare is in the same complex as Rider's, although they are not next to each other. They moved a store or two down within the last two years. The folks at Fanfare are pretty (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.us.michlug, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Coming to Kalamazoo
|
|
(...) Hehe, it happens! Nik's a spacer through and through, so I feel your pain. So is your son coming with? I can try to remember to bring my copy of Kevin Wilson's LEGO Thomas(1) and cars and track and stuff (although setting up in a restaurant (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.us.michlug, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
|
(...) Kevin- That's an unsolved problem for us that gets worse when we are in a hurry and as the layout gets larger. When we are not rushed, we losen the bolts a little and jiggle things until the square tables just fall into place. For our current (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
 | | Re: Nice Viper
|
|
(...) Hi all, This is my first post on lugnet, so don't blame me if anything goes wrong :-) First of all, thank you for the complements on my cadwork, I plan on selling this model in the future, so I don't publish the actual file yet. Therefore, all (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
|
(...) I should point out that at SCLTC, we initially provided spring clamps for temporary connection ($0.99 each) or until bolts were installed, but decided that they really were not necessary. We use wing nuts and just fasten the bolts finger (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
|
(...) Kevin- I agree totally that making tables is -- or can be -- a lot of work. If all we ever did with the tables was set them up at matching heights at a show and then lay LEGO on them, it would definitely NOT be worth it. What does make it (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
 | | Re: Inspiration
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing. Does this site work under Firefox? I mousedover as instructed, then tried clicking, but didn't see much beyond the text boxes changing. Certainly no pics! Or was I just too impatient or something? (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Coming to Kalamazoo
|
|
(...) You got it. OK, so I'm supposed to be Mr. Bigtime-Lego-Spaceship-Builder, right? Our home is brimming with space MOC's galore. And what is my 3 year old son into? Trains!!! He's got the Thomas the Tank Engine toys, books, videos, Leap Pad (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.us.michlug, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Inspiration
|
|
I found this site earlier today and thought it might be of interest as a source of inspiration. (URL) artships> Chris (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Nuovo firmware per RCX
|
|
(...) ...mi scappa di chiedere una cosa, visto che non ho capito bene.... <domanda stupida> compatibile 100% con quello originale Lego sgnifica che lo posso programmare con il linguaggio originale che trovo nella scatola base ? In questo modo ho (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
 | | Re: input used as output
|
|
(...) Have a look at the book "The Unofficial Guide to LEGO Mindstorms" from Knudsen / Noga published by O'Reilly. ( there may be other sources, but that is mine ) My book is translated to german (and published in the year 2000) so the following is (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
 | | Question about Lego Mindstorms Infrared Protocol.
|
|
Hello, From (URL) site I got the description of the RCX infrared protocol. Now I tried to send the opcode for a double beep, I calculated the following: Opcode: 5901 (beep beep) binary = 01010101 11111111 00000000 01011001 10100110 00000001 (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
 | | Re: In preparation for BrickFest '05
|
|
(...) I note that the loco in those pictures is not cloaked in Lego parts however. That was the hardest part for me. The front is made from two "6091 - Brick, Modified 2 x 1 x 1 1/3 with Curved Top". Of course, they got "adjusted" along with some of (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Re: Taz
|
|
(...) wow, this is pretty durned amazing. The whole look and feel of taz is perfect, you expect him to bob up and down while panting! why didn't you put drool comin out of his mouth? -mark (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
 | | Re: In preparation for BrickFest '05
|
|
(...) Interestingly, youre not the first to have tried this. Phillipe Label has done it too: (URL) some great work there. what did you use for the loco front? I can't make out. Samarth (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Exploriens MOC - The Coronado
|
|
Raay, finally got around to posting a link to this :D (URL) Steve (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
|
Here is what NELUG uses. Most of our tables are 40.25" x 40.25" or 4x4 32x32 baseplates. The extra .25" is to account for the fact that the baseplates are not exactly 10" square but ever so slightly larger. We also use some 40.25" x 20.125". Finally (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
 | | Re: Discussion of Train Table Sizes
|
|
(...) The NBLTC has adopted a modular approach using 80 studs wide x 160 studs long standard table (module) size. This works for us but the overall design allows for a multitude of arrangements and optional sizes within the modular concept. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
 | | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) We're doing everything we can to secure that, behind the scenes, although we don't yet have it, it's only a communication issue, we're pretty sure. I'd rather not go into more detail than that for privacy reasons. (...) That's a key point. We (...) (21 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|