 | | Re: Oh Baby! Cool, new element!!
|
|
(...) Two White ones come in the 2005 Fire Engine set and four red ones are in the 2005 Enzo Ferrari 1:17 set. Bruce (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A brief thank-you.
|
|
damn, just after I get every part on the list (and use them all in the one MOC too) a new part is added that I dont have :P (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | What does RCX stand for?
|
|
RCX'rs, I know it is a silly question and one that has probably been asked before, but what does RCX stand for? If I could find the answer, I wouldn't have to ask. Does it stand for Robotics Command System or Robotics Command Extrodinare? What? Todd (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts)
|
|
(...) I received a little LEGO brochure years ago that said something like 8 standard 2x4 bricks can be joined together (standard LEGO building techiques--not these 'rotate on a stud, therefore infinite) over a million different ways. That's 8 (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
(...) As David Ward suggested me, the oscillator is most probably equipped with a ceramic resonator with built-in capacitors. This explains the low precision of the clock (tolerance for ceramic resonators is in the 1% range while for crystals it is (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone want a spaceship design?
|
|
(...) Yep, I did--probably the best decision I ever made. (...) <snip> (...) Yep, best decision I ever made :) (...) Dave "Appreciating-the-Red-Brick" K (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone want a spaceship design?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) You tell 'em, Janey! (...) Dave K (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | A brief thank-you.
|
|
To those of you who have emailed reviews for Space Computer: Thank you for making space. just a little more space. -Grand Admiral .space Curator (URL) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 2648(2?) Container Grab
|
|
(...) The 1-01 is raised very slightly from the 2648 so it makes sense. (...) Ok, wish me luck :) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts)
|
|
(...) ... (...) Two 1x1 bricks can be connected together in an infinite number of ways. The top brick can be rotated freely to any angle and still connect, and the angles are countless. Given a 10 piece collection of different parts, the number of (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts)
|
|
(...) Hello. Very interesting question. Just the selection of pieces from a collection generates a very large amount of possibilities; Selecting 10 pieces from a collection of 100 (different) pieces generates 100!/(90!*10!)=100*9...0309456440 (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts)
|
|
(...) Ahh, but that isn't true -- rotate one of the pieces. There are, in fact, an infinite number of ways to connect those two 1 x 1 bricks. (Of course, you probably can't tell the difference between two 1x1 bricks connected at 22 degrees and (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea Crunching
|
|
(...) I thought I only said that once. And in haste, which I sort of regretted at the time. They can look OK, I guess my main beef with them is that they're a big cop-out on the modelling challenge side of things. I mean, many of us amass a large (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Is lego *truly* unlimited? (some thoughts)
|
|
I was just wondering today about how much lego is trumpeted as having an 'unlimited' number of possibilites. Now I'm no math whiz, but it seemed logically impossible to me. So here's some food for thought for the gurus out there to digest and make (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Berlinetta
|
|
(...) How utterly gorgeous. We were all raving about this at the last meeting. Masterful use of slopes, hinges, snot, everything! I've never been more tempted to make one of my own. Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavy ion cannon fighter
|
|
(...) I think your is way better than his. It's such a great-looking design, I think you've really improved on the original, I much prefer yours. Which is really the way it should be - after all, why imitate if you're not refining the concept? I (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Shuriken
|
|
(...) Very sexy! I think this is my favourite use of that canopy. The way you've integrated it in with the wedge slopes, it's so well done! (...) I love them all! Mmmmm, taste the rainbow of fruit flavours. All you're missing is some shade of green (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Builders Wanted
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:I8Dy8u.237x@lugnet.com... (...) house. Iain (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Naboo AirSpeeder
|
|
(...) That's a pretty sweet use of those ugly yellow undersea leg things. Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: This is kinda fun . . .
|
|
(...) Dave, why do you change the thread subject name? It's a bit confusing trying to guess what you're replying to... I guess I don't see the point. What is the point? Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (21 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
