To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 13316
13315  |  13317
Subject: 
Re: RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:08:54 GMT
Viewed: 
6730 times
  
> I suppose that this problem comes from bad capacitor loading of the crystal used
> on RCX. Crystals need to see some capacitance to oscillate at the right
> frequency, generally in the 10 to 30pF range. Even if PCB traces themselves
> bring some capacitance, there is no added caps on RCX PCBs (see
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=38746), this should be enough to
> explain the problem.

As David Ward suggested me, the oscillator is most probably equipped with a
ceramic resonator with built-in capacitors. This explains the low precision of
the clock (tolerance for ceramic resonators is in the 1% range while for
crystals it is in the 0.01% range). Resonators are cheaper too ;o)

Philo



Message is in Reply To:
  RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
 
Hello dave, (...) A made an experiment this night using a RCX 2.0, the clock was fast by about 10s per hour. I suppose that this problem comes from bad capacitor loading of the crystal used on RCX. Crystals need to see some capacitance to oscillate (...) (22 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR