To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 13322
13321  |  13323
Subject: 
Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:43:52 GMT
Viewed: 
3365 times
  
This announcement isn't quite ready, but while we're on the subject of rolling
[soccer] balls, I figured I'd leak out a bit of info.

We're working on a standard (currently in testing) for modules for "The Great Ball
Contraption."

Looks fun ;o)

One of my goals when building Bob's clock was to get my feet wet in ball
moving...

One foreseeable issue: if an upstream unit has more throughput than a downstream
one, we shall get ball overflows!

Philo



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
 
(...) There will be a minimum throuhgput to solve that. Right now, we're testing with 1 ball/second. So, the very first module will be regulated to run somewhere just below that speed. As long as everyone else can meet the minimum, there will be no (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
 
(...) This announcement isn't quite ready, but while we're on the subject of rolling [soccer] balls, I figured I'd leak out a bit of info. We're working on a standard (currently in testing) for modules for "The Great Ball Contraption." Think Rube (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR