Subject:
|
Re: 2648(2?) Container Grab
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:42:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2466 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Dean Earley wrote:
> > I have been looking at modelling the Container grap peice which is on peeron as
> > 26482 (http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/26482).
> > On closer inspection of my peices, one is labelled 26482-01, the other is
> > 26481-01.
> > Should this piece be called 2648 instead? (Also exists on peeron but isn't in
> > any sets).
>
> Conventional wisdom is that imprints of the form N-NN are present to identify
> the indidual "well" in moulds that produce multiple copies of a part.
>
> Considering that the matching grip is 2649, I think it is highly likely that the
> part number for the grab is 2648, and you are seeing a combination of the part
> number and the mould well number. Is there any spacing between the 2648 and the
> 1-01? Other supporting evidence is the proximity of this number to other 264x
> parts that also first appeared in the 1991 Nautica sets.
The 1-01 is raised very slightly from the 2648 so it makes sense.
> If this theory is true we should probably see "2648 3-01" or "2648 1-02" or
> situations where due to random assortment an individual set has two parts
> numbered like "2648 1-01".
>
> I'd go ahead and model as 2648.dat.
Ok, wish me luck :)
--
Dean Earley
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2648(2?) Container Grab
|
| (...) Conventional wisdom is that imprints of the form N-NN are present to identify the indidual "well" in moulds that produce multiple copies of a part. Considering that the matching grip is 2649, I think it is highly likely that the part number (...) (22 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
