To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 16581
16580  |  16582
Subject: 
Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:58:24 GMT
Viewed: 
518 times
  
In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer writes:
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote:

I like this idea a lot - it does not damage the standard because it is
100% adaptable.  And I like the idea of wide corridors :-)

I think it is far far to early to be changing things like the general
corridor concept.  The corridors are one of the main things that (literally)
hold all of this together.  Like Paul and many others have said before I
think we should wait a long time before we change up the basic formula.  If
you want to do this to your module we can't stop you but we're not going to
put any mention of this on the moonbase site.

It seems to me that the basic formula worked out in the standard should be a
_minimum_ for compliance, rather than a _maximum_ for inclusion.  If person X
designs a moonbase module that doesn't look and act just like yours, but it
does: a) leave 4 studs at the edge, b) connect to the standard connector, and
c) use primarily light grey at the connection point, then why not allow it?

When you say that you're not going to mention it on the web site, does that
mean that you won't link to modules that use double wide connectors?  Or just
that you're not going to specify an alternate connection standard?  If you're a
moonbase coordinator at a public fest, and someone brings a module that plugs
into your just fine, but is also able to plug into a wider corridor, will you
turn it away?

Modules should comply with the standard enough that _any_ modules can be
plugged together.  But why be more uptight about it than that?

Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
 
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:H12Hn5.40@lugnet.com... (...) disconnects (...) 100% (...) I think it is far far to early to be changing things like the general corridor concept. The corridors are one of the main things that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)

19 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR