Subject:
|
Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 21:28:02 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
353 times
|
| |
|
|
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=23517
I have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit
through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor
would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still
easy to convert to the narrow pathway. Is this design acceptible for the
standards?
BTW, anyone want me to design a Moonbase logo? I am pretty good at drawing.
--
Markham Carroll
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| my 2 cents, keep this idea on ice for a while... i think we should let the moonbase ideas ride for about a year before we start messing with them (we went through a lot of arguing just to get TO them :-) imho -paul (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| Actually, this seems like a pretty good idea to me; I'd been struggling with the idea of an in-door mass-transit system & this could solve one of the problems quite eligantly - the use of 'shims' so that you can mate it with either standard or 'fat' (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| (...) This can only work if all wide corridors are set 2 studs back to allow room for the adapter to the standard width without affecting normal design. This would also mean you need a four stud deep connector to attach two wider corridors together. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
