Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 01:33:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
413 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jude Beaudin writes:
> In lugnet.space, Markham Carroll writes:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=23517
> >
> > I have designed a corridor that allows space for more minifigs to fit
> > through, and some corridor converters. The doubled width of the corridor
> > would work well in the high-traffic areas of the moonbase, and are still
> > easy to convert to the narrow pathway. Is this design acceptible for the
> > standards?
> >
> > BTW, anyone want me to design a Moonbase logo? I am pretty good at drawing.
> >
> > --
> > Markham Carroll
>
> This can only work if all wide corridors are set 2 studs back to allow room
> for the adapter to the standard width without affecting normal design. This
> would also mean you need a four stud deep connector to attach two wider
> corridors together.
Not necessarily. You can make a modular connector sleeve which disconnects
from the corridor itself with 1x1 technic bricks. So, switching out a
standard connector with an adapter would be easy. Similar to the modular
corridor idea on the Moonbase site, if people want to make their mating
interface modular to allow for adapters, that's cool too.
I like this idea a lot - it does not damage the standard because it is 100%
adaptable. And I like the idea of wide corridors :-)
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:H12Hn5.40@lugnet.com... (...) disconnects (...) 100% (...) I think it is far far to early to be changing things like the general corridor concept. The corridors are one of the main things that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Moonbase Project: Wider Corridors?
|
| (...) This can only work if all wide corridors are set 2 studs back to allow room for the adapter to the standard width without affecting normal design. This would also mean you need a four stud deep connector to attach two wider corridors together. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
