Australia : 2952


Local / Australia / 2952	2951 \| 2953

Subject:	Re: Long barrelled, bayonet equipped muskets
Newsgroups:	lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.pirates
Date:	Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:47:01 GMT
Viewed:	1829 times

In lugnet.loc.au, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: > Longbows were replaced by firearms, not crossbows, and that was primarily out > of disuse more than effectiveness. Cool. How come longbows fell into disuse? And and how come we bothered with crossbows at all? I love finding out about this stuff :-) Regards Richard Still baldly going...

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Long barrelled, bayonet equipped muskets
IIRC crossbows were used because they were A LOT more accurate than longbows. (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.pirates)

		Re: Long barrelled, bayonet equipped muskets
(...) Crossbows were easy to use - there was a lot less training required. Years less, to be specific. They were good in castle defense when rate of fire was less important and a pre-drawn bow was valuable - as little time exposed as possible. The (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.pirates)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Long barrelled, bayonet equipped muskets
(...) knife (...) Longbows were replaced by firearms, not crossbows, and that was primarily out of disuse more than effectiveness. Bruce (24 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.pirates)

15 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search