Subject:
|
Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:57:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
356 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > However, as far as I can see it looks like you reacted to his
> > criticism of you more than anything else.
>
> Interesting guess, but wrong. Here are the threshold breakers:
Not really a guess.
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6608
> http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6609
Both of which were before your post in the same thread:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6616
But you did not disallow him for more than an hour after you read
the "threshold breakers", in the intervening time you read and replied to his
denigration(1) of you?
Further, I can't remember anyone being excluded from LUGNET without having a
right to reply in admin.general... ...but I don't claim to have 100% knowledge
of this area.
Scott A
(1) Tempted to say flame, but I think flames a best kept to e-mail. But those
who undertake flames don't get any "glory" from that.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
