 | | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Take 4 of them and use them in the middle of 4 (24 x 24 w 1/4 circle cutout) green base bricks from 5987, or that's what I'm planning. (...) Must say I wasn't expecting orange base bricks in Belville, but Arctic did use many orange elements (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) You might be right, it does match the color of the 6x6 roof which is definitely trans blue (I'm guessing this is actually the new trans blue that Belville has which is a little darker than trans light blue). If so, it would be really cool, and (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Frank, where did you see pictures? best LFB Also: Pete, are the fires out, finally? (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
(...) Or is that a transparent base brick ? Let's hope so. (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | New 2002 Belville Sets
|
|
Hmm, just had a look at the new Belville sets. Ship dates in February and March. 5836 Beautiful Baby Princess $3.99 23 pcs Purple DUPLO cradle Purple 4x4x4 chest w/white drawers Purple Scala potty Small assortment of transparent bricks Purple 4x4 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
Norton Anti-Virus told me that I had a worm virus. Usually considered a reliable source. I scanned my computer after I went to the site because the scripts that it ran concerned me. We have our computer set so that we have to accept scripts in order (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) The difference is that Bionicle is not a licensed property, Lego created it. For Star Wars, Jurassic Park, Bob the Builder, Mickey Mouse et al. Lego bought or paid for the license to use those characters, stories, and images. Essentially (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) I was wondering the same thing, especially when Zhengrong started this thread recently: (URL) other than the intentional "animated TRS-80" look of the site, is leading folks to believe that there is a problem? Matt (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) That is very true. But it's an incremental new era, not a revolutionary one. (...) The first time, except for Bionicle, right? And except for all the licensed add-on bits for the main LEGO brand, right? :) Steve (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) The galidor website does have a virus-like appearance, but I have a very much up-to-date virus scanner that didn't get triggered. What makes you think it gave you a virus? --Bill. (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
UUGH!! A visit to this site gave me a worm virus. I'll never go back! Rose "Jonathan Lill" <jonathanlill@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gr4Ay4.ALo@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) look (...) of (...) silhouette (...) each (...) be (...) than (...) does (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
(...) Hmmm, a "revolutionary toy concept?" I'm still waiting to hear what distinguishes these from the Socket Poppers action figures I bought about 10 years ago. BTW, I think I saw a TV ad indicating the show debuts this coming weekend. (...) No (...) (23 years ago, 7-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Galidor, for good or bad
|
|
Lego.com now has a page for Galidor and they are updating it apparently in a lead up to the Toy Fair. They started with the large picture of character silhouettes that we saw in a winter catalogue and day by day they seem to be filling them in. So (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Two really impressive 2002 sets ...
|
|
These pieces are more accurately called "SPUD"s rather than "POOP"s. SPUD==Special Purpose/Useless/Decorative BTW, I catagorize Pirate Hulls and Masts as SPUDs, too. OMFIAMP. -gyug (...) [...] (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Links Up with BMW Williams Formula 1 Team!!!!
|
|
"Duq" <duq@iegateway.net> wrote in message news:GqvDor.GA9@lugnet.com... (...) go (...) I was looking forward to this set until I saw this post. If it really is a Silver Champion chassis with new panels then I won't be parting with my hard earned (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Links Up with BMW Williams Formula 1 Team!!!!
|
|
(...) page 14): (URL) A (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Links Up with BMW Williams Formula 1 Team!!!!
|
|
(...) Looking closely at the pics you can see that it's the same model apart from some of the body panels which look like new elements. Same end attachments as the current-generation technic bodywork (so they fit onto the SC chassis), but the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Links Up with BMW Williams Formula 1 Team!!!!
|
|
(...) Is it exactly the same model as the Silverchampion but in other colors or is it new model with other parts ? Rene (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Samsonite Info
|
|
(...) I don't have any of these to examine. I would think they are some product of decay, or maybe an original impurity. One theory: the plastic has a flaw that is widening; think of when your plastic turns white when you bend it to the point of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.1971, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Samsonite Info
|
|
(...) I've been thinking about the old logos. Sometimes they do not all face the same direction. I wonder if they were applied to the mold with a stamping tool, or if these features were inserts to be screwed in. One interesting thing: you can see (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.1971, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
