| | Re: Alpha Team 2002
|
|
(...) Uhhh, it looks like a standard LEGO female shoulder-length hairpiece, in dark red? (...) No can do, because I've never owned a Cam fig before. I gave the 2001 Alpha Team offerings a pretty wide berth. LFB (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Racers
|
|
AHHHH! I hear about these sets but then don't see them until Febuary! I HATE the stores around here! Josh (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Racers
|
|
(...) Some people have found the 2002 Star Wars and Alpha Team, but you probably saw them too. (...) Which one? (...) Can you attach the new Racers wheels to the old 2 X 2 Plate With Wheel Holder, or any other method of wheel attachment (Technic (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Alpha Team 2002
|
|
(...) Dark red hair? Cool! How does it look? Could you tell me if her face looks the way it does on the (I think) box art at :(URL) Or is it still last year's design? Thanks, -L (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Alpha Team 2002
|
|
(...) Yep. And her hair is *dark red*, the new 2002 color. The number of parts etc., : Pieces: 91 Cool pieces: Cam's hair, dark red; legs and torso, a *dark blue*; the new propeller housings; The entire curved-slope canopy system (this set indcludes (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Alpha Team 2002
|
|
(...) Tell me more about the AT Navigator and ROV. Number of parts, interesting parts, etc. It has the Cam figure, right? How many pieces in the $5 Alpha Team set? (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.aquazone, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: 2002 Alpha Team at TRU (SFBay area, CA)
|
|
Cross-posting... screwed up the first time. -- Kevin ---...--- (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: 2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
|
|
Actually I'm pretty happy with those. There is actually space between the two legs. Many people use two round 1x1 plates stacked on top for each leg, to make dwaves and hopits or what ever these are great and I think will look better than the four (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: 2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
|
|
shouldn't that be stubbies© :) looks like we'll get hobbits after all -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "John Radtke" <jaradtke@mindspring.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | 2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
|
|
Not to keep anyone in suspense but there will be some grumbling here. We have short minifigs but they did it at the expense of articulation, yes, they are solid: (URL) maybe not as good as they could be but still better looking than many of the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Spiderman Lego set list
|
|
(...) I hope they use the Gringott's head, but in a different color (Green?). More variety for the Orc army I am planning... (...) I think Spidey Legos is a great idea. Especially if they do the masks/helmets the way Shaun thinks they should. (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Spiderman Lego set list
|
|
(...) of licenses, but I'm pretty excited about this, if it turns out to be accurate. And tying it into Studios seems to make sense as well ... without the risk of threatening new town sets (such as they are) Hmmm, I reckon they'll use the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Woot! sig immortality! :^) Of course at this point all Harry Potter is, is that it's also just parts for castle. I personally don't consider HP part of Castle , Ninja was HP is NOT, YMMV. It just has yummy castle pieces :^) Mike (23 years ago, 12-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
great page Matt! G Matthew Gerber <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GMFuJ9.8LJ@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
You're welcome Eric. Matt (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Thank you Mathew Gerber
|
|
While working night shift things get slow, So I start poking around the Web to see how far my name has managed to infiltrate the internet. When I came across this page created by Mathew Gerber: (URL) did'nt realize he has made this page and I am (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I think more important is the first bit from the quote, which says that LEGO owns all merchandising rights. Any company that wants to make Galidor toys, has to get a license from Lego. Which means that Lego is on the upstream side of any (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
|
(...) Oooo...ooo!!!...!!! Okay, I have to accept that the classic Town, Space, Castle & Pirate division of product has long since changed. They are still around from the old Shop @ Home occasionally, but TLC did a NICE job on the new Alpha Team (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I think this means they have most major toy categories locked up (including the "action figure" segment). On the one hand, it means they will be able to stand out better (unlike the Bob the Builder sets, as I mentioned previously), but on the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
|
| | Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
|
|
(...) I don't know if this answers the issue as for Galidor, but here is a little more info... (URL) the article: "As merchandising rights owner, Lego holds master toy and software licenses and is currently negotiating with licensing agents. The (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|