To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 34290
34289  |  34291
Subject: 
2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002
Date: 
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:45:36 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1439 times
  
Not to keep anyone in suspense but there will be some
grumbling here.  We have short minifigs but they did it at the expense of
articulation, yes, they are solid:
http://home.att.net/~johnradtke/minilegs.jpg
So maybe not as good as they could be but still better looking than many of
the brick options out there.

Excerpted from the Ewok Attack review http://news.lugnet.com/starwars/?n=12120

#388
John



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: 2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
 
shouldn't that be stubbies© :) looks like we'll get hobbits after all -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "John Radtke" <jaradtke@mindspring.com> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)
  Re: 2002 year of the mini-minifig legs
 
Actually I'm pretty happy with those. There is actually space between the two legs. Many people use two round 1x1 plates stacked on top for each leg, to make dwaves and hopits or what ever these are great and I think will look better than the four (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2002)

3 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR