 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I thoguht all these licenses were stupid, but these "requirements" make them intolerable! (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
He did state that while LEGO has HP they will not be releasing castle, same as with SW, but I do not think that that precludes re-releasing old established sets in the Legend and Classic lines -- Overkill is the only sure kill. SR "Jeff Stembel" (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I haven't bought any dinosaur yet. However, I am planing on buying one of the sets for parts. :-) (...) What? No new EP 1 sets? No new podracers?!?! DEAR GOD NOOO...OOO!!!!! At least there will be some new classic sets. Oh god, I hope one of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure he said it, because I remember being very unhappy about it. Jeff (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Why did they stop making Town sets? (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Not in my mind. Maybe a few parts for castle, but that's about it. (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Sounds interesting..any more info? (...) And I hope soon. Any hope for Pirates or Town? (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Hmm, but if you were to go on the asumption that kids these days jsut aren't into building, and that today's industry is based on hype and advertising, what about the fact that there are no television commercials for Lego anymore? Surely you (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) What? I know he mentioned it with SW, but I don't remember him saying it abotu Castle, I thought people were merely speculating that. (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or Legends). (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
In lugnet.year.2002, John Rudy writes: <snip> (...) Roger that... They gave the info, they knew what would happen to it, no issue. Matthew, by being mysterious, is doing his source a disservice. (if it was OK for him to know and discuss, he ought to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Geez, replying to my own post...this is bad, but I needed to revisit this with some thoughts. Yeah, I agree, Harry Potter is a poor substitute for a true castle theme. Also, Star Wars is a poor substitute for a true Space line (although I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I wish I could tell you this isn't true, but I believe this to be the case. No true castle that I could ascertain. There were some new sets dealing with some type of monster theme (like vampires, werewolves, etc) They even had a werewolf head (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) I'll answer the rest of this too. Yes, I've seen the robots, being a big fan of battlebots I'm only 1/2 satisfied but I realize Lego has it's own mindset on the issue so I'm okay with it. I think there is a grabber, a pusher, a "puncher" and a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Larry et all, I'll poke my head in here and tell you all about some 2002 info I got, it's a long story, bear with me. As some of you know, I attended the National Scout Jamboree in VA for 12 days last and this week. (Returned Wed. Night) My (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) OK, here's a question or two for you: Where did you get this information, why should we think it's authentic, and if you do assert it's authentic, is it information that TLC wants revealed at this time? Todd once said he didn't want to see (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Castle= Harry Potter Everything else is just parts for castle (or so I've heard) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) How close is this to being new Aquazone stuff? (...) Great! Is the large Slave 1 a UCS model, or just an improved System set? (...) With the current field and the expansion packs, why do we need two more? (...) Is this the old Town theme Race, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) You've got to be kidding. Where is Castle? I hoped to see Pirates back, same with Town. Maybe some other decent new themes. What a joke. None of the above lsited crap interests me in the least. Maybe Star Wars would be ok if I was a Star Wars (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Is this an actual question or the start of a whine-fest? If it's a question, ask about a specific question and maybe it will jog my memory. If it's a whine-fest, this is the year 2002 newsgroup. You need to go to the 1993 newsgroup and post (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
