|
Thomas Michon wrote:
> > Good web design takes smaller resolution screens into account, and uses that
> > thinking to help the user work efficiently. Remember, not everyone has the
> > resolution you do on your development box.
>
> 1280x1024? I almost can't stand 1024x768 these days...
A lot of people use laptops, where 1024x768 is most common, and that
still required scrolling. Most of the time, I didn't bother since I
could see enough of the image.
Older folks also usually run at lower resolutions so they can read text
(you will probably find a bunch of older folks running 640x480 on a 20"
monitor :-).
Larry is right though, the most effective web sites cater to lower
resolutions, while also allowing for larger resolutions (so a long
document for example usually can be put on just one page (and not even
necessarily forcing width).
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Pictures of SCLTC's Latest Show
|
| (...) Like my shark? =) There's plenty more details which didn't make it onto the site, so I hope I can get more images up! (...) I find a mousewheel quite useful in such situations! I've been to some galleries where the prev/next options are on the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains.org.scltc, lugnet.trains)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|