|
| |
|  
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.667)
|
|
 | | Save 9V Boxcar
|
| (URL) is a simple boxcar for $19.02USD I made for the cause of saving 9V trains. I realize this could unintentionally step on the toes of (URL) this.> So if you can use those containers I would urge everyone to buy them instead. Simply because the (...) (18 years ago, 16-May-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX) !
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.666)
|
|
| | SNVT Action #1
|
| (URL) This is the first organized action taken by Save 9v Trains. With the advent of individual part pricing using LEGO Factory we have created a SNVT Container. The cost of this container is just $4.26. The hope of this action is to further raise (...) (18 years ago, 9-May-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.664)
|
|
| | Re: Factory Train Contest Entry
|
| (...) I love the loco Ross (John). Just remember that to be included in the contest you need to submit it to the Gallery on Save 9v Trains. Here are the (URL) Rules and Instructions.> As a quick update the "Rolling Stock" and "Diesel/Electric" (...) (18 years ago, 30-May-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.663)
|
|
| | SNVT Build-a-Train Contest
|
| Save 9v Trains would like to announce its first (and hopefully not only) contest. The contest has been set up to support 9v Trains by using LEGO Factory to build a quality database of models that can be purchased by long time AFOLs and Newbies. Our (...) (18 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.655)
|
|
| | Save 9v Trains
|
| I have to say that I'm really depressed by the defeatest attitude surrounding Eric Kingsley's post about trying to save 9v trains. Someone who actually has the ability to give our feedback to Lego has stepped up, given us what information he has, (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.625)
|
|
| | Re: 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
| (...) Not that I feel like I have to justify my actions but this single issue is so big that I thought it needed its own forum for organizing and making our case. The site has little to do with LUGNET, we arn't going to post MOC's. We are trying to (...) (18 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.625)
|
|
| | Re: 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
| (...) Steve, For what its worth the Ambassadors were not trying to step on any toes. A question was possed and someone specifically asked for the Ambassadors help here on LUGNET. I took that call for help and used my resources to get permission to (...) (18 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.623)
|
|
| | Re: Save the 10183 trains!
|
| In lugnet.trains, Jeroen de Haan wrote: ... (...) In working with LDD, I've found a couple of tricks. First, even in the instruction mode you can change your viewpoint to see the bricks that have appeared (a "highlight new bricks" feature in the (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.471)
|
|
| |
|
9v, trains
(score: 2.432)
|
|
| | LEGO killed the train club
|
| Man, LEGO trainheads used to live in a thriving community worldwide with multiple clubs coming together and displaying larger than life train layouts at least once per year and then LEGO stopped making 9v trains... What do you miss most about "the (...) (13 years ago, 14-Sep-11, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
9v, trains
(score: 2.398)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO trains are great!
|
| (...) Hello - At least Lugnet Train newsgroup has not been killed! I have to agree, that 9V is preferable for Club layouts, since battery power is not easy to be supplied for daylong operation. The rechargebale box loads extremely quick, however the (...) (13 years ago, 19-Sep-11, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
9v, trains
(score: 2.366)
|
|
| | Re: Just An Idea: Part Dew
|
| (...) Ahhh, Thanks for the clarification and context. That is pretty cool although I doubt we should so blatently steal a header like that. With that said I really would like ILTCO support for (URL). I really want to get the discussion there going. (...) (18 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.258)
|
|
| | Save 9 Volt Trains
|
| Now is our chance to take action and help influance a decision within LEGO before a point of no return is reached. In order to do that a web site has been created for the purpose of saving the 9v electric train line. Access to the site is free. At (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.256)
|
|
| | Re: rebeco
|
| (...) Having thought about it a bit more I think I understand how it works. The locomotive makes use of the fact that Lego points are sprung and allow travel from the 'wrong road' in a trailing direction. Jason has in fact posted a bit about his (...) (18 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.249)
|
|
| | 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
| Hi All, As you know there haws been a change in ILTCO's contact person at LEGO and unfortunately the "9v Announcement" was made via the Ambassadors list rather than the normal ILTCO channel. Moving forward we hope that this issue has been fixed. (...) (18 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.248)
|
|
| | 9v Train status report.
|
| OK, we have been given a limited amount of information that we have been authorized to share. Now I am a fan first and Ambassador second so I am going to give you all the nuts and bolts first. After that I am going to break down each statement as I (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains, FTX) !!
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.245)
|
|
| | Re: Cleaning Battery Terminals
|
| (...) I just finished a second RCX and while the terminals aren't as shiny as the previous RCX, the RCX fired right up after I reassembled it. The crud on this latest RCX's terminals was bluish green so I suspect the outer silver layer got eaten (...) (16 years ago, 9-Jan-08, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
save, 9v, trains
(score: 2.174)
|
|
| | Re: Converting an Emerald Knight to run on 9 volt track
|
| (...) FWIW, on the page it's "Night", and "bogey". I will probably be ordering my EN today, and am too considering options. I have quite a mix of 9V and RC stuff (in fact, about 1/2 the Lego trains back to 1980) Probably I will suck it up and buy (...) (15 years ago, 30-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
9v, trains
(score: 2.102)
|
|
| | Re: Pulling power of different train systems
|
| (...) Mark, sorriely I have broken down the small rig after the test series, so I have no quick access to a wider testing procedure..... (...) The speed of the Emerald is clearly much lower in comparison to 8866. If you run 8866 at a reduced speed (...) (15 years ago, 28-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
9v, trains
(score: 2.100)
|
