Subject:
|
Re: 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 00:41:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2292 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Steven Barile wrote:
> * "Do you think Eric has overstepped his bounds by launching the save.9vtrains
> website?" - Didier Enjary
> There are no "bounds" or jurisdiction as far as ILTCO is concerned. ILTCO is
> made up of a collection of clubs (Eric's included), so that we can have a
> central repository for train related materials (www.ILTCO.org) and a way to
> easily communicate with each other (in the form of the Assembly mail list).
>
> Do we need another train web site and discussion form when there is Lugnet and
> www.ILTCO.org? I tend to think that fragmenting sub-topics dilutes the message
> and lessens the appearance of solidarity of the train AFOLs.
Not that I feel like I have to justify my actions but this single issue is so
big that I thought it needed its own forum for organizing and making our case.
The site has little to do with LUGNET, we arn't going to post MOC's. We are
trying to save what may be one of the most important productlines for the AFOL
community. It also is not in competition with ILTCO. It is not about
organizing the community or setting standards or releasing new products. It's
sole purpose is attempting to save the line.
What happens to the site when the final decision has been made by LEGO? I can't
honestly say, it hasn't even crossed my mind. Maybe it will continue on in some
form or maybe it will just cease to exist.
I understand that all Train fans want 9v saved. I also understand that ILTCO
would like to save 9v trains as one of its missions. All I wanted was a site
that was completely, 100% focused on that one task. I would like to include
everyone that has an interest in 9v trains. If I can't do that I will be
disappointed but it won't diminish my desire to save 9v trains.
-Eric Kingsley
http://save.9vtrains.com/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
| I hear some of you saying that there are certain expectations of ILTCO that aren't being met. I also assume that you might be picking up on my frustration but it isn't pointed at any one person. So let me try to explain how I see ILTCO helping the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 9v Update (ILTCO's involvment)
|
| * “Could you please explain why ILTCO is the normal channel for such issues?“ - Didier Enjary ILTCO is operated under a democratic process. All 33 member clubs are equally represented and receive communications at the exactly the same time thru the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
