| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, John Gerlach writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > But I can outdo Lego, set design wise, and you all know it, so I'm happy no
> > matter what happens, within reason.
>
>
> I *didn't* know that.
Not paying attention, that's all. Here is a proof for you:
1. You design better sets than TLC does.
2. I design better sets than you do.
3. Therefore, by transitive closure, I design better sets than TLC.
QED :=)
(this german keyboard is driving me nuts and it is a (ptui!) Mac besides. )
++Lar (from Horst's house in Böblingen... we hit some stores REALLY hard this
AM and it was great fun...)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
| (...) Easy there Lar. This is supposed to be a friendly group where we are forget our differences. Chris Hey, "ptui" rhymes with "GUI"! Sorry, I was amused by the rhyme...I guess I haven't gotten much sleep lately. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
| (...) 1: I would never claim that. I build stuff with *one* idea in mind - realism. I don't worry about piece counts, or difficulty to build, or price points. Lego would probably never use one of my models as a "set", because they would be too (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
