To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 3301
3300  |  3302
Subject: 
Re: GATS Tampa Show...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:24:25 GMT
Viewed: 
54 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:

when polled, 87.5% of minifigs claimed to be "too short for their weight"
rather than "too fat for their height", 12.3% denied they were chunky and said
that society discriminates against the vertically challenged, and one, who
happened to be at the all you can eat buffet at the time, punched the pollster
and said "yes, in fact, that IS a hollow leg, what's your point?"... at which
point sampling was discontinued.

In other words, they're not overweight, they're undertall!  ;)

Jeff



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: GATS Tampa Show...
 
(...) Just (...) All together now: "Minifig scale!" Seriously, they're not to any particular scale. Neither are minifigs. You could carry out analyses that pointed to any scale from about S (1:64) on up to G (1:22.5, the LGB Narrow Gauge, not the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

18 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR