 | | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Well, some of us are big enough-- at least, that's what she said! (...) lol, it's too bad that I'm not further along with my 14 wides, because when I get rolling, I'll be ramping up the rhetoric BIG time! JOHN (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | candy and ***** size: was Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) That was pretty close to what I thought when I read the post. Extra fun for all! Tim PS. Although a real man with no need for compensation would do it in 6w. (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) You're a braver man than I. As I think about it, though, that's a totally cool idea! Imagine if you could get it to be some sort of automated hopper delivery system... Put a trigger on the side of the train that opens up the hopper as it goes (...) (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Well, there *is* a very practical reason to run some stuff 8 wide. An 8 wide hopper is big enough that you can put last year's cheap Halloween candy in it, and let kids carefully grab some from the train. Either let them get it from the slowly (...) (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) We all want to be bigger, John. Tim PS. Been ages since we had a good size war here :) (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Bingo! That's exactly what I like! Or want to, anyway:-) JOHN (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) That's one way of dealing with it if you like to run giant trains. Alternatively you can come up with a system of (URL) 5 wide containers> to fit correct 6 wide rolling stock. Tim (13 years ago, 25-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ararat 1972
|
|
(...) Absolutely awesome layout. Very inspiring. Cale (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) John is right about the dimensions of containers compared to train rolling stock. We at the (URL) PennLUG Institute for LEGO Intermodal Studies> have confirmed this and come up with our (URL) own standard> of 6 and 7 wide containers to fit our (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Containers are about 8' wide. A loco is generally about 10' wide. That's a ratio of 4:5. The ratio of 6 wide to 8 wide is 3:4, but that is certainly more plausible than 1:1 (6 wide to 6 wide). And I mention again for emphasis: the cars and (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Locomotives are not 33% wider than containers. I'm pretty sure anyway. If the locomotive is 6 wide plus some overhangs here and there, handrails, etc, and the container is 6 EXACTLY, that seems to me like enough of a difference. Container well (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Well, that's precisely my point. I was actually directing my comment towards TLG. You really can't have locomotives being the same width as a container, or a bus or a police car, for that matter! But I do not pretend to understand their loco (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) I wonder if the price will be jacked up higher than typical train sets? Comparing to the container ship price increase this year, I might expect it. None-the-less, I really like this set and would consider multiples depending on price as well. (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) I see no reason to do that, looks like LEGO didn't in that set design... :) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) And if the new standard for containers is 6 wide, maybe it's time to revise the width of a train to 8 wide! (URL) JOHN (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Maybe it's time to revise the containers that clubs use to swap to fit what seems the new standard... (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10 Wide Thomas
|
|
(...) lol "Super Thomas" (URL) I am impressed with the PF motor, although the initial investment was rather steep. Ross and I have been talking about using the PF train motor in conjunction with the 9 volt motor, getting its power from the tracks (...) (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.tcltc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10 Wide Thomas
|
|
(...) Absolutely awesome work John. I love the use of the Duplo Thomas nose, it fits in perfectly. Annie and Claribel look sweet. The power functions bit makes me very happy. It looks like he runs well in the vid. I'm tempted to build a version for (...) (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.tcltc, FTX)
|
| |
| | 10 Wide Thomas
|
|
Well, this MOC has been a WIP for years, and now I have finally finished it (with, of course, help from my consultant, chief designer, and son, Ross:-) (URL) (Click (URL) HERE> for more pics after moderation) When Ben Fleskes starting producing his (...) (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org.tcltc, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
|
(...) Whoa! That is awesome. That engine is epic, the Maersk color scheme rocks on a train. Even the flatbed cars look great, and I normally don't care for flatbeds. This will look good along my BNSF and... ahem... Enlighten brand Union Pacific. I (...) (13 years ago, 23-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
