Subject:
|
Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:06:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
24625 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
I see no reason to do that, looks like LEGO didn’t in that set design... :)
|
Well, that’s precisely my point. I was actually directing my comment towards
TLG. You really can’t have locomotives being the same width as a container,
or a bus or a police car, for that matter!
|
Locomotives are not 33% wider than containers. I’m pretty sure anyway.
If the locomotive is 6 wide plus some overhangs here and there, handrails, etc,
and the container is 6 EXACTLY, that seems to me like enough of a difference.
Container well cars are not that much wider than the containers either.
Didn’t we have this argument lo so many years ago?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
| (...) Containers are about 8' wide. A loco is generally about 10' wide. That's a ratio of 4:5. The ratio of 6 wide to 8 wide is 3:4, but that is certainly more plausible than 1:1 (6 wide to 6 wide). And I mention again for emphasis: the cars and (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10219 Maersk Container train set
|
| (...) Well, that's precisely my point. I was actually directing my comment towards TLG. You really can't have locomotives being the same width as a container, or a bus or a police car, for that matter! But I do not pretend to understand their loco (...) (13 years ago, 24-Jan-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
