To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 28512
28511  |  28513
Subject: 
Re: Istanbul Tram
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:07:12 GMT
Viewed: 
4269 times
  
--snip--

  
  
   Nice work, but I have to say, Tim, that these kinds of shrouded cars scream to be built in 8 wide.

But then I’d lose the fun of squeezing the shrouds in as much as possible.

   Check out GMLTCer Steve Demlow’s 8 wide version:



I’ve admired that one before. I love the window arches and rivets on it. Didn’t realise it was the same model (or similar anyway... the faces are slightly different)

Check out this linkie Ours is the first North American version of the FLEXITY Swift.

And I’ll raise you with this. You can see the two face designs there (maybe three).

  
  
   Don’t be constrained by self-constraint;-) JOHN

While I do love building small and trying to squeeze as much detail into a small space it’s not entirely self-constraint. Often I design things with the idea of possibly using them in a future diorama. Given my lack of space and brick going 8-wide would make it impossible for me to fit in all the life I would like to. This 80x80 diorama would only have just over half the space if I was basing it around eight-wide scale.

Hmmm. I don’t really equate scale with width so much. The scale to me is determined by the figs themselves. So 8 wide is the same scale as 6 wide (and since the figs are “fat”, shouldn’t everything else as well be? :-)

JOHN

I “scale” stuff only insofar as things look OK together. In the case of 8-wide it’s more the length I’m worried about (I’ve actually selectively compressed this tram by stripping a door and some windows from each car). I tend to use minifig height as an approximate guideline but really it’s more a matter of wverything working together for me.

Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Istanbul Tram
 
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote: <intermittent snippiages> (...) Bingo. (...) It's all about you, isn't it, Tim? :-) JOHN (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Istanbul Tram
 
(...) Thanks. I didn't document it very well, and now it is in mothballs. It won't come back until we redesign our subway modules (which is at least a year away). Hmmm, maybe I'll lend it to the GMLTC.... (...) Check out (URL) linkie> Ours is the (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR