 | | Re: What if..... —Tim David
|
| | | A very interesting idea, it takes the advantages of the train bases (strength with with the height saving of the inset bogie (truck)) but with far more flexibility of use. I think Lar's suggestion of leaving off one end and adding more holes would (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What if..... —Steven Barile
|
| | | | Leaving off the end isn't a bad idea! In my mind's eye I see the end terminate as any other single plate thickness. Great thinking! How about a 1x2 stud notch off the end too. This way if a pair are tight up against each other (or a 6xn plate is (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Tim David
|
| | | | | (...) Do you mean at the end of the top surface? If so I think is would be a useful idea. (...) The added height of the side probably increases the strength considerably (its like a girder) but yes, most models have the strength elsewhere in the (...) (19 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well, maybe not (if you are counting from the closed end). But I wanted to go to 11! (...) Truck with a pin all the way at one end. I've done it before. That pin will swivel if placed between 2 and 3 (19 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —David VinZant
|
| | | | (...) Did you see my most recent update to the part? I added 11 holes and opened the end. At first I opened the whole end. Then I thought well there is only 4 studs of usable space on the end any way. So I made a 4 stud opening. (URL) picture. Dave (...) (19 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I suggest 5 for the width (hey, half stud offset!), in case someone is swivelingright up to the edge and is using this inside an 8 or larger wide creation. (19 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) How will you get the bogie plate to rotate adequately though? Perhaps 7-wide would be better. To solve the 1-wide-plates-along-...e-problem, make it 8-wide! On second thoughts, that wouldn't work for locos with a thin stripe of one colour at (...) (19 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't use one. Would use the 2x2 tile with technic pin instead. (...) Bzzt, wrong answer. We're talking about a part that we want LEGO to make. It needs to fit in with their current parts and be useful to what they do. They do 6 wide. (19 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —David VinZant
|
| | | | (...) Larry brings up a good point. When you think about a "Dream" part you have to look at how it would benifit the TLC. I think the 6x12 train plate has the potential to elliminate the need for the 6x24 and 6x28 train plates. Aslo from a (...) (19 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What if..... —Ondrew Hartigan
|
| | | | (...) I’m an 8 wide guy so I’ll throw my opinion in here. I began building 8 wides because I wanted to have the freedom to build as wide, as long and as realistic as I possibly could. For those reasons alone I don't use train plates. The 2x4, 2x6, (...) (19 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
