 | | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
All these polarity-switching solutions presume only 1 train. If you've got 3 trains, and each of them is hitting a block boundary at the same time, you're going to have a short no matter what you do. Best solution for DCC is to get your insulated (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) Just so you know, if you want to accomplish the same thing without sawing on your track, get some clear 3M tape and stick it on the inside face of each rail. You have to put some between the tabs connecting to the next piece of rail, too. You (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) Going to try that tonite--I own only 4 loco motors, and 3 are now converted to DCC. Hopefully I'll get my hands on about 3-4 more motors and convert 'em. But tonight I'll run 2 motors on one engine on one DCC channel and test that. I think it (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) An easy solution to this is to have two locomotives in the train, each tuned to the same DCC channel. If one loco loses communication, the other will push it through the bad spots... That probably why real trains have two locos, right? :) (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) And here's 'more playing...' (URL) two pics, but fun ones... One of these pics shows how old my ccd in my digital camera is--all the 'blank' pixels. Eh, it still works and is now on (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10028 Level Crossing Sneak Peek!
|
|
(...) Actually LEGO has offered at least one 4-wide train and that was in 1965, prior to the introduction of the track: set 323. The 1966 trainset 111 (with track) has already 6-wide plates, but the engine is 2-wide with a 4-wide cab ;-) Niels (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Vose Inspection Car MOC
|
|
(...) front (...) the (...) well, you can only sit on that kind of inspiration for long. Here it is... the motorized version (beta .01a) Vose Inspection Car. (URL) Vose is powered by a custom fitted drag wire connected micro motor housed in the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Streamliner Observation Car
|
|
What's "The Tin Men" about? Never heard of it. Tin Men (URL) a train movie but very funny all the same ... why did aluminium become cheap in the US at that time? In the 1950s. Steve (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10028 Level Crossing Sneak Peek!
|
|
(...) <grin> (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Vose Inspection Car MOC
|
|
hey thanks... i didn't want to use the snot on top, but without the top of those long wedge slopes, there was the option of making it work, or buying the parts off bricklink. In the end i'm not sure but I think that the studs only in the middle is a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Vose Inspection Car MOC
|
|
hey Shaun, thanks for the cudos. I have to say that I've been wanting to build train for real ever since seeing the article where lego gave you props for that awsome steamer you made. So know that you had a great hand in the inspiration of this MOC. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) Yep--Larry hit it on the head--the isolated section is so there isn't one set of wheels on one polarity, and the other set of wheels on the reverse polarity-- (see if this font is really courier ;) ) ###...### Track TTTTT O O ###...### Track (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) The latter I think... by having a truck long gap, the motor coasts across the gap but never shorts out from one wheel set to the other, once it hits the powered side again (even though the polarity is reversed) it just continues on. This is (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Streamliner Observation Car
|
|
(...) Yeah, I hadn't thought about that. And I made a slight error in my observation; I kept thinking your observation was closed-end, not open end. In which case the manufacturer would be K-Line for O gauge. They have the same effect though. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Vose Inspection Car MOC
|
|
Cool inspection car! Definitely captures the look of the original, especially with the use of the curved wedges. It's hard to use those in a prototypical model, but you definitely got it. As for powering it, I don't know where you could stuff the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Segregation is finally abandoned on the Burlington Northern
|
|
(...) yes I would ... and be happy to do so ... and how do I? .. or who do I send it to? (...) yes I did ... but it crashed into all the scenery!!! Only half-kidding ... but even long engines like my Alco PA-1 have clearance problems ... but I have (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) Okay, yeah, my memory of what I too used to do years ago got cross-wired. Then I guess I don't understand the set-up that is causing his need for a gap to be crossed. Is it a DCC related issue or simply him not reversing the polarity of the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Vose Inspection Car MOC
|
|
(...) Heya Travis, I saw the pictures of this on Brickshelf even before you posted, and I was blown away. I would love to see some sort of automation added to this, so that it could tool around, even if it had to be slowly, on some small (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10028 Level Crossing Sneak Peek!
|
|
(...) I couldn't follow the paragraph either and I wrote it. I was taking a break from writing a research paper and analyzing a SPSS data set, and wrote a lightning quick idiotic post. I hope you read my apology that followed. (...) Do you need any (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) That diagram is divided into two blocks. One for the approaches, and one for the reverse loop itself. That's standard wiring, been done that way since I was a wee lad, there's no need to divide the reverse loop itself into two blocks. With (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
