| |
In lugnet.trains, Guido Heunen writes:
> Yes, Ho type points, that would be awsome....
> I have drawn some possible points a while ago in brickshelf:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=92413
Neat. I'm sure I'm not the only one who would kill for a reversible throw.
> However, to model "real" traintrack other points are needed!
> Such as a point where both legs are curved. This would be ideal for station
> layouts, as well as points with a crossing shape (see brickshelf).
Oooh...Lego wyes!!! That would be awesome. We'd be able to turn our
engines much easier. Still needs a lot of space though... :^\ It would
still be neat. If only Lego had this many different switch styles out:
http://catalog.rossswitches.com/browseGroup.cfm?item_group_id=6868
-Stefan-
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Track radius question
|
| Yes, Ho type points, that would be awsome.... I have drawn some possible points a while ago in brickshelf: (URL) would also like to see points without the "S" curve, but with a cleareance of only 8 studs. However, to model "real" traintrack other (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
