Subject:
|
Re: Brad J Brickfest 2002 Keynote Speech synopsis
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:04:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3035 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickfest, Frank Filz writes:
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > The Super Chief is a train, not a locomotive. A locomotive by itself is not
> > a train. Hence this locomotive is not going to be called the SFSC by me. Ever.
>
> Actually, technically I think a locomotive can be a train. Normally,
> anything running on the mainline is a train, whether it is a single
> locomotive, or a locomotive pulling a number of cars.
>
> Frank
Even though I no longer work fo the NS, they describe a Train as "an engine
or more then one engine coupled with or without cars, displaying a marker."
It also says see Rule 19 which basically says on single or multiple engine
consists, the rear engine headlight on low acts as a marker.
It's probably the same on most railroads I would think. Then again, perhaps
the definition of a train has changed since the Super Chief's days.
Jeff Christner
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
