Subject:
|
Re: Brad J Brickfest 2002 Keynote Speech synopsis
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events.brickfest
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 03:31:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2383 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickfest, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.events.brickfest, Gregory J. Overkamp writes:
> > Lar transcribed:
> > >
> > > ?: Military?
> > > A: Lego don't do military!
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Lego doesnt do military. Really. So a set like 6762 Fort Legoredo, 6271
> > Imperial Flagship, or 6280 Aramada Flagship are not military based sets?
>
> No, Lego doesn't do *modern* military. You won't be seeing tanks and F-16s
> until they are totally obsolete, like the Sopwith Camel is, if even then.
People do talk faster than I can type. (1) But in some cases I got what was
said word for word.
This is one of those cases (2). You could sort of tell that Brad was semi
expecting the question and had a snap answer ready to go. (the "maybe" in
answer to "are you going to announce something" was another one) which I
repeated verbatim, right down to the deliberate use of don't instead of doesn't.
It got a laugh, and the questions rolled on.
Maybe next year the questioner who asks this canonical(3) question will have
to phrase it more carefully, I for one would dearly love to dig deeply into
the whole no guns, muskets and pistols, machine guns on the sopwith etc.
with a LEGO person but suspect it would not be a fruitful discussion, this
is an area where you probably won't get a straight answer.
1 - I know, I know, it's hard to believe, but it's true.
2 - for the answer anyway, someone was asking me a question so I missed who
the questioner was and what the start of the question was, some people
really mumbled! Shame on them!
3 - and you KNOW it's canonical, it always does get asked.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
