To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 12077
12076  |  12078
Subject: 
Re: 2x2 turntables vs 2x2-with-pin plates was Re: Un-powered replacement for train motor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:12:21 GMT
Viewed: 
919 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes:
I was going to use the 2x2-with-pin plate in my designs too, but I found the
2x2-with-pin plate to make my cars to tippy.

Your right this does make it a little tippy.  I forgot to mension I was
building 8 wide, so I was using a technic plate to mount the truck to the body
of the engine.  This along with the extra width of the engine, and the extra
length I used on the truck has alleviated alot of the tippyness.  Althought the
engine isn't complete, and it hasn't had a good run on the tracks, so I can't
say for certain this won't be a problem.

Derek



Message is in Reply To:
  2x2 turntables vs 2x2-with-pin plates was Re: Un-powered replacement for train motor
 
(...) I was going to use the 2x2-with-pin plate in my designs too, but I found the 2x2-with-pin plate to make my cars to tippy. When I made my double-stack well cars (what is the right name for those?) I decided to try the 2x2-with-pin plate to put (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)

11 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR