To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 12076
12075  |  12077
Subject: 
Re: 2x2 turntables vs 2x2-with-pin plates was Re: Un-powered replacement for train motor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 13:07:32 GMT
Viewed: 
424 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Jason J. Railton writes:
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes:
I was going to use the 2x2-with-pin plate in my designs too, but I found the
2x2-with-pin plate to make my cars to tippy.

What you need to do is put some tiles around the pin-plate.  Not right to
the ends of the bogus motor block, but about the 6x6 size of a normal bogey
plate.  If you do take the tiles right to the end, it won't rotate properly
under the wagon plate.

Jason J Railton

Oops, I meant 6x4.  I find if you're centreing the pin plate you can tile a
7x4 area around it without having any turning problems on a 6x28 baseplate.
It's a shame those old 2x3 helicopter rotor mounts don't have the right size
pin on them.

Jason J Railton



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 2x2 turntables vs 2x2-with-pin plates was Re: Un-powered replacement for train motor
 
(...) What you need to do is put some tiles around the pin-plate. Not right to the ends of the bogus motor block, but about the 6x6 size of a normal bogey plate. If you do take the tiles right to the end, it won't rotate properly under the wagon (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)

11 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR