 | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) SD since it has 6 axles. :-) (...) They look nice but I am not totally convinced that using G models as your prototype is prudent, G has some distortion, no matter what you do, because of the gauge/scale issues with it. You'll be close but if (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Oh, Eric, you mean *14 wide*....>;^D (...) Lar is correct. There isn't even a particular "G" scale, although there is an effort to codify under the term "Large Scale" (LS). G scale can refer to 1:22.5 (LGB), 1:25, or 1:29 (USA). The correct (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | | | (...) 1:22.5 (...) 1:32. You forgot 1:20.3, 1:24, and a small smattering of 1:30. Also, many more manufacturers than LGB and USA Trains. And many of us "large scalers" don't appreciate the efforts to "codify" our scale names under the NMRA. We like (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Yikes, sensitive subject;-) Hey Katie, I'd *love* to hear more about your hobby! What scale *do* you model, and have you ever considered modeling LEGO trains to G scale? I have done some of this and intent to do a lot more, and using Belville (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, yes. Not for me though. I could really care less. But for many of the others in "G scale", "Large scale" or whatever, they really get their noses out of joint over it. And when they explain their reasoning I see their point but still (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | | | (...) Sounds like the great 8- vs. 6-wide debate (no debate is to polite word) squabbling that goes on around here. (...) snip We seem to be a bit friendlier around here than some of the folk populating the other parts of the internet, and John (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) lol I guess we know why those yahoos post there;-) (...) I'll tell you what. I am so tired and bored with people who have such narrow POVs with respect to LEGO. Paint your LEGO? Decal it? Cut it? Combine it with Bestlock (well, okay, even *I* (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | | | | (...) in (...) Ya, that was sorta my take on it all. I just took my toys and went home. Some people just don't play well with others. (...) you (...) Thanks! Yes, once upon a time I had one of the largest Playmobil collections around but I don't (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) as (...) Some (...) cheap (...) couple (...) Ooh, I really didn't need to see those pictures... I keep stealing glances at the Playmobile toys. They just look so nice, and mixing them with large scale trains ooh ahh (of course Playmobile's own (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? Now: G Scale —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Frank, Thanks! I have other pictures too but I have a major space limit on that server and I'm already over.... I used to buy many of the Playmobile train cars to "kitbash" and make other cars from them. They were good cheap parts. LGB used to (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Neals Baits, I'm biting. —John Kelly III
|
| | | | | | ...snipped until the part where John goes fishing... (...) ...snipped some more... Okay, I'll bite. I've never had a problem with people deciding to decal, cut, or use other bricks. All I've said is that it's dishonest then to call it a "Lego" (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Neals Baits, I'm biting. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.trains, John Kelly III writes: <snip> (...) I read through this fairly carefully, and unless J3 is saying that J2 is saying that people should say that their creation is "pure" when it isn't, I do not think these two are disagreeing. And I (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) Bah! You are right I was just tierd. I had been looking at GP9's just previously and must have been confused getting myself... :-) (...) I think both have their merits. "G" or "Large Scale" as John more aptly puts it is nice because of its (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) There's a perfect example, thanks Eric! I agree with you, you *need* to make things selectively compressed in length, but my point is that I prefer to make that decision starting from an accurate depiction, instead of thinking that something (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Katie Dokken
|
| | | | (...) Hmmmmm..... Are you trying to say that Lego is to_scale? So what scale is Lego exactly? What gauge? And do the scale and gauge match? Not all "G" scale is distorted. There are some incredibly talented people hand laying their own track and (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Great train related web sites? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Sorry if I wasn't clear. I am NOT saying Lego is to scale. I am just saying that I prefer to choose where to introduce distortion rather than working from an already distorted model. Now, the amount of distortion in, say, that model that Eric (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
