Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:23:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@iwantnospam#IHateSpam#.ctp.com
|
Viewed:
|
44 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> > > > (I can't tell since I'm part of the noise)
>
> (Wow, I just looked at the stats for this group, and you account for 18.3%
> of the posts to lugnet.trains in the past 7 months -- 4 times as much as the
> next most frequent poster. :)
Well... you know... when you know four times as much about the topic as
the next most frequent poster, that happens. <grins, ducks and runs>
> > > > or are you thinking ahead?
>
> Always. :)
Shocked, just shocked.
>
> Matthew Bates:
> > > I'm not against it either but I think if club related stuff were
> > > off in another group then I'd probably never read it since I'm not
> > > in any club. And that would remove a possible incentive to get me
> > > interested in joining/starting/attending a club.
>
> In the robotics sub-groups, what happens is that the lower-level groups (the
> more focused groups) make occasional cross-postings to the higher-level
> group (the more general group) to keep people in the loop on things. Then
> they set the followups to the focus group and go nuts on the details.
I guess that would work. IF people remembered to do it consistently.
>
> Tom McDonald:
> If it's too early for an lugnet.trains.org subgroup, that's OK. I mainly
> just wanted to know whether the basic idea/principle/nomenclature/structure
> was sound. Sounds like it is, since you independently arrived at a similar
> conclusion.
yes, the basic idea/nomenclature is sound. Go for it if you want to.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
| Larry Pieniazek: (...) Difficult to tell, but critical mass isn't much of a metric here as it is on Usenet, mainly because groups are archived and easily past-browseable and because it is so easy to create new groups and receive them as mailing (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
