In a sense, these almost qualify as informal clubs. The discussions are very
specific and are very roundtablish.
What about other groups, such as the San Francisco Bay Area group baylug.org?
As you know, we have a domain name now. Zonker Harris seems to want to
form a LTC here in SF, which is good and could be it's own group IMO, but
baylug itself is not exclusively a train site. Should baylug.org have a group
on lugnet too? I'm not asking that you create one, cuz I ain't in charge, but
am asking if this kind of thing makes sense for baylug and other unofficial
lego clubs too.
Tom McDonald wrote (in part); (...) Boy, I turn my back for a week, and look what goes on! (Just kidding! ;-) I like the BA-LEGO email list, which is also automatically (email) linked to the lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf groups list. (Though I don't know for (...) (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf.sj, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.trains)
Larry Pieniazek: (...) Difficult to tell, but critical mass isn't much of a metric here as it is on Usenet, mainly because groups are archived and easily past-browseable and because it is so easy to create new groups and receive them as mailing (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
