Subject:
|
Re: Green line pics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 21:10:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JOHNNEAL@USWEST.avoidspamNET
|
Viewed:
|
2069 times
|
| |
|
|
David Eaton wrote:
> Of course the real reason I did it 8 wide was just to annoy all those
> 6-wide'ers out there ;)
You da man;-)
I have obviously restrained myself from flogging the merits of 8 wide here,
partially due to the fact that I feel my work in that area may be finished:-)
Once, I was a lone voice in the wilderness, but now that more and more folk are
building 8 wide, the merits are becoming self-evident (as seen in your model,
Dave).
Of course you are kidding about your motivation for building 8 wide; you took
measurements, etc, and tried to build the most prototypical model possible-- so of
course you'd end up 8 wide.
And BTW, if your measurements seem to be off a little, remember this: it's the
*figs* which are off. 1 stud = 1.3 feet is about the best ratio I can come up
with.
Welcome to 8 Wide Utopia:-)
-John
>
>
> DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Green line pics
|
| (...) Yep, I'm quite the anal retentive nerd when it comes to minifig scale measurements: (URL) despite all that, I still usually go by 7mm = 1 minifig foot, even though 8mm (1 stud) is still reasonably accurate and also allows for more detail... it (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Green line pics
|
| (...) Thanks! :) (...) No, your instincts are right on :) It's too tall for minifig "scale" I think (although I think if you go by minifig side-to-side width then it's fine (but that makes minifigs something like 4'6" or something)) It's actually (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
