| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Tom McDonald writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Bates writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > I'm not against it, but do we have critical mass yet? Also, what problem
> > > is it trying to solve? Is trains too noisy already (I can't tell since
> > > I'm part of the noise) or are you thinking ahead?
> >
> > I'm not against it either but I think if club related stuff were off in
> > another group then I'd probably never read it since I'm not in any club. And
> > that would remove a possible incentive to get me interested in
> > joining/starting/attending a club.
>
>
> Hrmm. I could see where that would be convenient for the clubs themselves with
> spelled-out geographical description to avoid the alphabet soup for newbies.
> IMO, if you start .trains.org you might want to consider which groups could
> also have subgroups:
Okay, I'm a dufis. Shoulda read further back in the thread. Sorry about the
waste.
-Tom McD.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
| (...) Hrmm. I could see where that would be convenient for the clubs themselves with spelled-out geographical description to avoid the alphabet soup for newbies. IMO, if you start .trains.org you might want to consider which groups could also have (...) (28 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
