 | | Re: IBLTC
|
|
(...) I also think it's an excellent idea, and I sure someone (me or someone else) from NALUG would be interested in participating. The GATS/Greenburg thing doesn't do us much good, since all the shows up here seem to be independant, but I still (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
(...) Well because you posted the question and referance NELUG twice I thought I should respond. First I hope you don't think NELUG ever lied or tried to cover up the fact that we had an over 18 rule. Quite the opposite in fact which I think is why (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
Please take any further followup to email, Kai (...) No, we're not. I bear you no animosity. I think you have some maturing to do but I have a great deal of respect for what you've achieved in the hobby, given your age. Feel free to dislike me as (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IBLTC
|
|
(...) Steve, I think this is a great idea and I volunteer my services as a NELUG rep. If you want more reps from NELUG I am sure I could get a volunteer or two. Now GATS doesn't come our way but several groups have done Greenberg shows and I am sure (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
<...snipped angry tones...> (...) It is much too late. Our first shows happened in 1985. <...More angry tones snipped...> (...) Kia- Sorry you're so upset. Just a FYI on the copyright info. To successfully defend a copyright, I'm pretty sure that (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: IBLTC
|
|
Pair Networks (who hosts NCLUG.net for me) provides a mailing list service. I can set up a list without any problem. Lists are MailMan based and work well. Mike -- Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com (URL) - North Carolina LEGO Users Group (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Nice model of a AMD103
|
|
Here are two pictures: (URL) saw this when I was browsing the new pictures on Brickshelf. I was wondering if anyone knows who built this locomotive, and if there are anymore pictures. I'd like to make a model like it. Josh (Who wishes he was part of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
(...) Well, something inside me says 'I won't touch this with a 39 1/2 foot pole' and the other half says, 'maybe a few enlightening observations could help here.' (...) Larry and I have not had a perfect track record, but I think I speak for both (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
SNipped (...) yes i do and i up hold my statement but i do not want tell you why to embarrass you and get insulting and i would need a .flame for that. (...) never was shouting, your just looking for something wrong with me. (...) I dont care any (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Track to return engine? In English?
|
|
Like mine.... www.geocities.com/so...tropas.htm Or in the real world: (URL) down) Sonnich Jeff Christner <regult@aol.com> wrote in message news:3a9af388.652789...net.com... (...) of (...) faces. (...) reverse (...) you (...) end (...) the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | IBLTC
|
|
International Brotherhood of LTC (or whatever) I think we should have a mailing list that includes a representative (or 2, or 3) from each LTC so that we can at least sync up wrt to GATS (honorariums) and creating a united LTC-ness. Perhaps this (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC Site
|
|
(...) Just trying to be helpful. I'm not asking you to fix anything. Chris (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Track to return engine? In English?
|
|
(...) None of the three wyes in this area use wye switches. (...) Some freight cars must also be turned before spotting them at their respective industries. Boxcars are sometimes marked "unload this side only" while some covered hoppers only have (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Track to return engine? In English?
|
|
Thansk all of you! I think passing loop is what I was looking for. Sonnich James Powell <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:G9C4H4.MrH@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) rather (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Small Town Passenger Station
|
|
(...) Josh (who wishes he was part of Dale Earnhardt Inc. right now) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Dog Bone' (improved reversing loop)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) After I had build my first reversing loop, I discovered it was possible to operate such a loop without te need for setting the switch. Ofcourse this requires that you always run through the loop in the same direction, but you (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Dog Bone'
|
|
(...) Yet another good reason why it would be nice to have a wider radius track section... For now though if you have room you might want to consider extending the loop part of the dogbone. Of course if you extend it to much it really isn't a (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 'Dog Bone'
|
|
(...) The thing for me is that I am more into the Single Track "Short Line" type of layout which is why I would like the reversing loops at either end. There are many good uses for the double track dogbones though and they are definitely easier to (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) Yea, I was a bit bummed by that, and the fact that the 2x2 outside corner is also there... (...) When I saw the 1x2 inverses in 7311, I said, aha, now I can afford to make the bow of a pirate ship in green (it uses both 2x2 and 2x3 inverse (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures of GFLTC at SMRC Train Show - Feb 24 & 25
|
|
Robin: (...) going perpendicular to the main line. Play well, Jacob -- (URL) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
