Subject:
|
Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 04:44:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
686 times
|
| |
|
|
<snip>
> I agree. Building in "Real Life" is an additional challenge. One could think of
> it as "Built Projects" vs. "Project Proposals."
>
> I've seen architecture exhibits where the designs were never expected to be
> built -- they were extreme solutions because they weren't limited by "normal"
> constraints (such as money, materials, gravity, etc).
>
> If such a deliniation were made, I would wonder if detailed blueprints or
> drawings would be eligible for submission. This would be appealing to me, but
> seems almost like another contest.
>
> -Suz
I agree with Suz with an additional comment. The "wow" factor of seeing a
picture using real bricks is different (not saying better, not saying worse
- just "different") than the "wow" factor of seeing a DAT/CAD rendition.
Both are works of art in their own right, but they are different mediums,
hence DAT/CAD should be in a different category - similar to oil vs.
watercolor at an artfair.
Mark Chan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Proposal: TOWN building contest
|
| (...) I agree. Building in "Real Life" is an additional challenge. One could think of it as "Built Projects" vs. "Project Proposals." I've seen architecture exhibits where the designs were never expected to be built -- they were extreme solutions (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.town)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
