 | | Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —John Heins
|
| | | Is TLS abandoning the classic "Technic" design concept completely? Looking at the new "Technic" sets, it seems that TLC continues its abandonment of the older "classic" Technic concept using holed beams and plates - replacing these with the newer (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | Ah, it's about time we have a new thread about the possible death of "traditional" Technic LEGO again! I think that, while there is indeed a large abundance of new style technic parts, which I welcome, there is also a major use of traditional (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —John Heins
|
| | | | Just look at the 3 new "Technic" sets. All seem to be made exclusively using the new style rounded beams and plates. I don't even see any traditional beams in any of the sets. Note - having not yet seen these in stores, I'm going by the SAH images. (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Miguel Agullo
|
| | | | My two cents: 1. The current technic electric motor needs traditional technic bricks to conect it to the newer liftarm elements - but is it being officially replaced by spybiotics/rc components? My bet is not. 2. The economics of a liftarm-based (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | "miguel agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) plz no!!! i want to have traditional technic motors they can be modified to use with liftarms but let them exist as motors not as (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | "pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:HDBwD1.148o@lugnet.com... (...) good sentence :))) ...from the other hand... sorry pixel (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | "pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:HDBwD1.148o@lugnet.com... (...) news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) superhero-multi-purp...act-module (...) I hope the Technic motors never goes out of production, actually I hope they (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
