Subject:
|
Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:30:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
830 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
"pixel" <pixsrv@poczta.onet.pl> wrote in message news:HDBwD1.148o@lugnet.com...
> but the in second hand
good sentence :)))
...from the other hand...
sorry
pixel
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
| "miguel agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) plz no!!! i want to have traditional technic motors they can be modified to use with liftarms but let them exist as motors not as (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
7 Messages in This Thread: ![Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -John Heins (13-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Fredrik Glöckner (13-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -John Heins (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Miguel Agullo (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Paul Kleniewski (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Øyvind Steinnes (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|