Subject:
|
Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:27:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
792 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
My two cents:
1. The current technic electric motor needs traditional technic bricks to
conect it to the newer liftarm elements - but is it being officially
replaced by spybiotics/rc components? My bet is not.
2. The economics of a liftarm-based system make complete sense for Lego: you
need 2 bricks to connect 2 bricks. But you need at least 3 pieces to connect
two liftarms: 2 liftarms and 1 pin (make that at least 2 pins if you are
looking for a fixed connection, rather than a flexible one)
I sure hope that the brick doesn't go away, but I am also a big fan of the
"slicker" look of liftarm-based models. BTW, traditional Technic bricks are
still being sold bulk on ebay.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
| "miguel agullo" <technicpuppy@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDBuAA.z3r@lugnet.com... (...) plz no!!! i want to have traditional technic motors they can be modified to use with liftarms but let them exist as motors not as (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
| Just look at the 3 new "Technic" sets. All seem to be made exclusively using the new style rounded beams and plates. I don't even see any traditional beams in any of the sets. Note - having not yet seen these in stores, I'm going by the SAH images. (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
7 Messages in This Thread: ![Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -John Heins (13-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Fredrik Glöckner (13-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -John Heins (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Paul Kleniewski (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Paul Kleniewski (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Are "classic" technic parts doomed? -Øyvind Steinnes (14-Apr-03 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|