To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 9337
9336  |  9338
Subject: 
Re: what else could be done
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic
Date: 
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:56:34 GMT
Viewed: 
296 times
  
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message
news:HAJnus.66L@lugnet.com...
<<snip>>

. 1x3 traditional Technic beam

Would that use holes between the studs or right below them?

right below can be done using 1x2 technic bric with 2 holes + 1x1 brick with
hole
so you know you will never see a coin with value 3 :))

1x3 brick with 2 holes could be good but a suppose in a few years from now
we will see only liftarms

pixel



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: what else could be done
 
(...) I hope not. Lift arms are great. They will never replace the technic beam in many applications. For one you could not used a technic beam with 2 plates and another technic beam on top and so forth to hold things together verticaly. Regards, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: what else could be done
 
<<snip>> (...) Would that use holes between the studs or right below them? Like this (URL) this (URL) both kinds? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)

15 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR