| |
> Reintroduction of single acting (old style) pneumatic cylinders.
Why on earth do you want those?
The only thing I like better is the fact they only use one tube per cylinder,
but most times it's not a problem.
I'd much rather have longer cylinders in the new style.
Best regards,
/Tobbe
http://www.lotek.nu
(remove SPAM when e-mailing)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: what else could be done
|
| hi when talking about cylinders or pistons maybe 2 way piston would be nice to previously discussed (yes tobbe i should use this word :)) T shape "angle" connector i would add cross shaped definitely dividing by 3 is not too simple by nature of (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: what else could be done
|
| (...) Maybe it's a little selfish of me to say "I want them so I can build more engines more easily". But, if I had them I would use them! They represent the cylinders of internal combustion engines a little better than double acting do. I know it's (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: what else could be done
|
| Hello, I would like to see: Packets or tubes that contain the correct lubricant for the pneumatic cylinders, pumps, and valves. A female towball pin to fit on an axle. A spool/slider valve for pneumatics. A gear perhaps in various sizes with a round (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
