Subject:
|
Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:15:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1228 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:01:45 GMT, "Thomas Avery"
<thomas.avery@intec-hou.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes:
> > cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding)
> >
> > Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :)
>
> Oh, it does move alright. Especially when you drop 16 pounds on it:
> http://www.texbrick.com/teaser/teaser4.jpg
He, I bet it is :) But I think you put them there really gentle and
nice and did not drop them at all.
BTW what do you use those weights for anyway? I can't see any muscular
overload with that amount of weight .)
> > > Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a
> > > .build.bridges newsgroup?
> >
> > Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet.
>
> I dunno about that. Have you seen:
> http://www.texbrick.com/links/bridge.html
>
> And it seems every train layout has at least 2 or 3 bridges. Bridge builders
> are out there!
Yes, they exist but I don't think they are that many. I might be wrong
though :) I feel they can be here as much as they want :)
/Tobbe
http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) Oh, it does move alright. Especially when you drop 16 pounds on it: (URL)Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a (...) I dunno about that. Have you seen: (URL) it seems every train layout has at least 2 or 3 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
