Subject:
|
Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:01:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1085 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes:
> cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding)
>
> Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :)
Oh, it does move alright. Especially when you drop 16 pounds on it:
http://www.texbrick.com/teaser/teaser4.jpg
> > Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a
> > .build.bridges newsgroup?
>
> Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet.
I dunno about that. Have you seen:
http://www.texbrick.com/links/bridge.html
And it seems every train layout has at least 2 or 3 bridges. Bridge builders
are out there!
TJ
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) nice and did not drop them at all. BTW what do you use those weights for anyway? I can't see any muscular overload with that amount of weight .) (...) Yes, they exist but I don't think they are that many. I might be wrong though :) I feel they (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding) (...) Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :) (...) Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
