Subject:
|
Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:03:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
773 times
|
| |
|
|
> > I think I'm going to stop posting soon, two flame-wars originating
> > from my posts *sigh*
>
> No! No more "good-bye" posts, please.
You have my word :)
> No harm done, I think. Just the butting of a few heads. It keeps life
> interesting.
Yeah, that's always something :)
> If you solved the rotation problem, then you could work out something with
> this. Again, the geometry will be more complicated because the diagonals
> will connect at holes not concentric with the center hole (i.e. you won't
> have perfect triangles). But it's worth a try!
Of course I have never tried to build a bridge or anything that uses a
truss (sp?) as of yet.
And BTW bridges should be .train or something, it's not Technic!
*joking*
/Tobbe
http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) LOL Hey! Do you want to start another flame-war? ;-) I've wondered about this myself. I think bridges are of interest to both groups. My bridge is made of mostly Technic parts, and my question was about construction technics involving Technic (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) No! No more "good-bye" posts, please. No harm done, I think. Just the butting of a few heads. It keeps life interesting. (...) If you solved the rotation problem, then you could work out something with this. Again, the geometry will be more (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
