Subject:
|
Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:16:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
900 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson writes:
> And BTW bridges should be .train or something, it's not Technic!
> *joking*
> /Tobbe
LOL
Hey! Do you want to start another flame-war? ;-)
I've wondered about this myself. I think bridges are of interest to both groups.
My bridge is made of mostly Technic parts, and my question was about
construction technics involving Technic parts.
Maybe bridges belong somewhere else altoghether. Do you think we need a
.build.bridges newsgroup?
TJ
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | RE: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| Why don't we just have one *HUGE* newsgroup and then apply our own e-mail filters! :-)) W PS - I'm not serious! -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Thomas Avery Sent: 15 March 2002 (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) cp lugnet.train sure, why not .) (still kidding) (...) Yes, but does it qualify as technic when nothings moving? :) (...) Nah, don't think there are enough bridge builders as of yet. /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
|
| (...) You have my word :) (...) Yeah, that's always something :) (...) Of course I have never tried to build a bridge or anything that uses a truss (sp?) as of yet. And BTW bridges should be .train or something, it's not Technic! *joking* /Tobbe (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
