To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *9006 (-10)
  Re: Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
 
Mark Chittenden <mdublade@aol.com> wrote in message news:Gt5vME.DwG@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) Why, are you trying to better my display at; (URL) and (URL) ;) (it can be bettered - I have added another bike since, and know of a few more) (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: How real should it be?
 
Hi Tobbe. I know exactly how you feel. In building my CAT 797 frame and steering I geared it down quite slow because I knew the end result would be a heavy model. In real life these trucks don't move very fast anyway. During Christmas I took the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Manas is nifty
 
Received a Manas (set 8539) today and I declare it nifty! I look forward to controlling it from the RCX. Menacing the St. Patty's Matoran: (URL) live mayhem (if there is live mayhem to be seen) (URL) (23 years ago, 19-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 
  Re: How real should it be?
 
(...) For another way to "read" code, try (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: SSPP power suggestion...
 
(...) All you really need the wheels for is friction to stop the entire thing slipping, so you don't really need a "vehicle" at all! Just a static base with your lever! The rules don't specify that it actuall has to be moveable! BTW, there's a fair (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Reply: I know exactly how you feel.
 
Hi Tobbe. I know exactly how you feel. In building my CAT 797 frame and steering I geared it down quite slow because I knew the end result would be a heavy model. In real life these trucks don't move very fast anyway. During Christmas I took the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: How real should it be?
 
(...) We're not alone in this universe. Eh. :) (...) I'm a think first, act later person. Meaning I think out a solution and go for it. If it fails at first I give it another go until it works. If it later turns out not to work... Well... (...) Ah, (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: How real should it be?
 
(...) :) (...) This plus the recent words of Jennifer helped me so now I'm set with that saying. Thanks, like I said, LEGO do broaden my horizon! (...) So I should run my IPMOC (In Progress MOC) down a slight slope to get it in speed? :) I'll see if (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: New Technic MOC: Dornier DO-228
 
(...) To my supprise not so difficult: The wing actually has a 'skeleton' consisting out of 16 x 1 technic beams in a standard configuration... ehhh... how to explain this in ASCII.... Beam: [OOO...OOO]]OOO...OOO]......... 2x 1/3 height plates: === (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Too much crane?
 
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GsEzyM.280@lugnet.com... (...) Not quite, although they are similar, and you can use that part in this situation, it just isn't very strong. This is the one here: (URL) Hmm... I wouldn't go as (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR