 | | Re: 8454 inventory from box - here is it!
|
|
(...) standard that the new 5 Technic sets have two booklets. The Off-Roaders (and other sets) usually had everything in one large booklet (e.g. instructions for main, alternative models, how to put in a motor, pneumatic pack etc.). There are two (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Radial Engine 6 or 12 cyl.
|
|
(...) I can't help you for a 7 or 9 point arrangement, but if you want a 5 point arrangement (like in the demo image), you can sorta cheat one by using five #5 angle-connectors linked in a ring. They aren't exactly 108 degrees, but it is possible to (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Retractable landing gear
|
|
This landing gear is inspired from the F4U Corsair. The mecanism is not 100% the same as real. Need Work. The video AVI is a DivX 5.05 format. (URL) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Radial Engine 6 or 12 cyl.
|
|
Today I have publish on my site a radial engine with 6 cyl. In reality most radial engine have 7, 9, 14,18 cyl. ,but I think it is not possible with Lego pieces in a small volume. I use a model team wheel 2695, 6 piston for the prototyp. The biggest (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Drat Soarer (2nd lego glider)
|
|
"Paul Krieg" <pdkrieg@epix.net> wrote in message news:HJ1wCC.12M5@lugnet.com... (...) brothers (...) he (...) the (...) completely (...) They did use a catapult: "The claim is based on disqualifying the flights made by the Wrights because "The (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8454 inventory from box - here is it!
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, I haven't built it yet. So here are so pictures of the inside of the box (I did open some of the bags, this is why the springs are in the open) (URL) instructions (URL) sticker sheet (URL) moderation: (URL) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Drat Soarer (2nd lego glider)
|
|
(...) (URL) (...) It was Samuel Pierpont Langley who used a catapult. His "Aerodromes" as he called them were launched from a catapult from the top of a house boat on the Potomac River. I think he spent some time IN the potomac, too. The Wright (...) (21 years ago, 3-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Drat Soarer (2nd lego glider)
|
|
"Daron" <ratasaurs@attbi.com> wrote in message news:HIxCpt.LuC@lugnet.com... (...) This is the best prop I've seen: (URL) one might be good too: (URL) this: (URL) that perhaps some one has built one for a model of an airplane. Once I figure (...) (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8454 inventory from box - here is it!
|
|
(...) WOW, cool. Yeah it was a good idea for Lego to put an Inventory on the side. Now I know what I get when I buy a set. Do you think you could take some pictures of the model? It would be really great if you could. Steve (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8455 Rear Tires
|
|
(...) No, they're not. I have both sets! The 8466's tyres and wheel hubs are MUCH bigger! The rear wheel HUBS of 8455 are the same as from the 8475 RC race buggy and 4404 Land Busters, but the tyres are completely brand new. I agree with the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 8454 inventory from box - here is it!
|
|
I received my 8454 fire truck last week. For those that want to see exactly what parts are included, here is a photo I took from the side of the box. (URL) think this is a really good idea from Lego to include this inventory on new technic sets. Not (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8455 Rear Tires
|
|
That is very interesting. I have three 8466's and none of the tires are like those that came with my 8455. The material is much more plastic like rather than the rubber feel of my 8466 tires. Greg "Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8455 Rear Tires
|
|
(...) I don't know. They feel alright and they're the same as the tires for 8466 which was a good set except for the unfortunate color choice. -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
(...) It is flex system hose, the rigid version. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: uCOG V - my tiniest weight shifting walker
|
|
(...) What is the grey cylindrical piece one up from the bottom in the second from the left column? It looks like it's supposed to be used in building step 2. Thanks. (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Backhoe not in my S@H Catalog
|
|
(...) Yeah it was the same for the #4095 Inventor Set in the 2nd Edition. The price of that one is $49.99 USD with a number of pieces in the 300s. I saw it at the Toy fair. (...) Oh, I was only kidding. I cannot survive without bying new Legos. And (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Backhoe not in my S@H Catalog
|
|
"Steve Moldovanu" <wolf_hunter_03@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HIyCwM.tIp@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Technic set #8453 was thrown in on the lower left-hand corner of p.8. I just noticed that Designer set #4098 is only listed on the back (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Backhoe not in my S@H Catalog
|
|
(...) Now that's even weirder! They actually put in the Wright Flyer! There is basically everything in there except Technic! You mean you don't even have the three mini Technic that came even earlier? Cool, they still put in the Shell Promotion sets (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Backhoe not in my S@H Catalog
|
|
"Steve Moldovanu" <wolf_hunter_03@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HIxzoI.14rG@lugnet.com... (...) 2nd (...) version? So (...) cover? That was my impression. Here is the table of contents from the Summer 2003 Catalog I have: BIONICLE pp. 4-7 (...) (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | 8455 Rear Tires
|
|
Curious if anyone else is unhappy with the quality of the rear tires on the new backhoe? I just got mine a few days ago and was seriously disappointed with them. Definitely not as nice as the usual rubber tires. Greg (21 years ago, 1-Aug-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
