 | | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I don't mind the helo and boat being a little plane-looking. And I am also sure they are intended to compete with MegaBloks. But I don't buy MB and have been waiting for this stuff from Lego for about three years now! MB is too laden with 2x4 (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: flying helicopter? (was: orrery update)
|
|
(...) Just browsed your site fully and wow cool! A suggestion for your helicopter - if you can build a single rotor with enough lift, why not just build 2 and connect them, like the chinook (URL) way the extra weight is offset by the extra lift 8?) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) All the spacecraft are brilliant - I particularly like the Arianne 5 and the shuttle. The truck is amazing, though I think the helicopter and boat are a little too plain. They're clearly intended to compete with the MegaBloks models of this (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes wrong along the thread. This way there (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) No, they'd never be able to pull it off without a lot of negative publicity. It only takes one complaint to scupper everything. As it is, I suspect there'll be several delays and serious reviews before they finally decide to release it. Even (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new electrics
|
|
in fact i thought that the axle will be the only electric part i mean the axle should be connected to wire the axles on the ends of wire should replace electric bricks it will allow us to put the axle into a hole and then move along so we would put (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I am delighted with the lack of mini-figs. Lack of mini-figs means the Lego designers are entirely free to choose the scale to suit the subject (and I guess the parts budget for the set). I have noticed this year that there are many more sets (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) :))) (...) it's absolutelly off-topic but here lies the crux of the matter old polish song "love will forget you everything, cause love is me" (is it understanable? :) pixel (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) once more (as found in <set:8446>) and in the correct number too! (...) <<snip>> (...) So why is there not an absolute ton of them OnLine yet? Don't get me wrong, I am very thankful for what we get and it seems we'll get bits and pieces (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) I don't mind at all. (...) I'm not. (...) Isn't that very unpractial? Especially when it comes to Technic with motors, pins etc.? (...) "Romance is when you can't stand to be apart, love is when you allow it." Another freely translated Swedish (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Love the ISS! The snowboard ramp looks fun too... Kecia (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Name: Eric Sophie aka Nickname: Legomaster, e Age: 32, 33 - July 31 2003 Sex: Male,I'm trying really hard not to make a joke here. :P Location: The Garden State - New Jersey Civil status: Engaged, house, and new paving on my driveway. Hope to (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) i know ppl don't like to be summarized but i couldn't stop myself (...) :)) me too (...) enough! the smile was to "more" :) (...) no :( (...) 1028..250.000 (...) don't laugh at me plz i know many ppl measuring their bricks by kilos (kg) (...) (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
(...) Oh, we're being summarized :) (...) Hoho, I still have some years until I'm average :) (...) And why the triple smiley to that? I'd like more females, two is not enough! BTW? Has Jennifer answered yet? (...) Correctemundo! It's the scientific (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Even more pictures appeared... (URL) in the German forum the photographer added this comment (added translation below): Ich habe ganz einfach gefragt ob ich denn fotografieren dürfe und dies bekam ich darauf zu hören: "fotografieren Sie soviel (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.space) !
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:H9IqBA.99@lugnet.com... (...) hi it's a little summary of us :))) BEGIN Filled in form (edit his part) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...-+-+-+-+-+ Name: lugnet .technic member Nickname: AFOL Age: (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) Actually, in my opinion, if the set were named Columbia, it would be a bigger seller, as it would now be a souvenir, or memorabilia for this recent tragic event. Sales-wise I'd call it unlucky. Just my $0.02 worth. Play well. Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
(...) I love the age posted on the helicopter box (4403). 0-99!!!! Yay! Tim Strutt (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
"TJ Avery" <tjavery@texbrick.com> wrote in message news:H9qHFq.JFL@lugnet.com... (...) Now THAT'S what I've been waiting to see :-) I figured Technic was not completely dead; just seeing what is in the 2003 Pitsco gave me some assurance. But that (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: new 2003 sets
|
|
This stuff is great!! I remember about three years ago, Lego said it would be about three years before they could begin emerging from the Junior Age. I've been waiting patiently for this to actually occur and am pleased that they stuck to their (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
