Subject:
|
Re: NLS opinion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:10:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <FwD75K.DGI@lugnet.com>, "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com>
wrote:
> Then why would she think the Snowspeeder is a good set? It was next to
> the UCS X-Wing also, and she still thought it looked good compared to
> the MF.
The Snowspeeder is probably the most accurate-looking of all the regular
Star Wars sets. Except for being minifig scale, it almost *could* be a
UCS set.
Plus almost any other Star Wars set looks more accurate than the MF. Not
that the MF is a bad set overall, but the trade-offs in scale and shape
that were made to keep the set within a reasonable price range make it
look much worse than most of the sets.
--
Mark D. McKean - The Quantum Panda - qpanda@iwaynet.net
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NLS opinion
|
| (...) X-wing (...) that Star (...) Then why would she think the Snowspeeder is a good set? It was next to the UCS X-Wing also, and she still thought it looked good compared to the MF. The Snowspeeder isn't anywhere close to being as impressive as (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
